![]() The Court said the right to publish all statements is protected under the First Amendment. The United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the newspaper. After losing an appeal in the Supreme Court of Alabama, the New York Times took its case to the United States Supreme Court arguing that the ad was not meant to hurt Sullivan's reputation and was protected under the First Amendment. The Alabama court ruled in favor of Sullivan, finding that the newspaper ad falsely represented the police department and Sullivan. Sullivan argued that the ad had damaged his reputation, and he had been libeled. Sullivan, took offense to the ad and sued the New York Times in an Alabama court. Most of the descriptions in the ad were accurate, but some of the statements were false. The ad openly criticized the police department in the city of Montgomery, Alabama for its treatment of civil rights protestors. In 1960, the New York Times ran a full-page advertisement paid for by civil right activists. Proposed Changes to Code and JC&D Rules.Confidentiality Regulations for Pretrial Services Information.Privacy Policy for Electronic Case Files.Special Projects of the Rules Committees.Preliminary Drafts of Proposed Rule Amendments.Congressional and Supreme Court Rules Packages.Permitted Changes to Official Bankruptcy Forms.Open Meetings and Hearings of the Rules Committee. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |